Public organizations are also being formed to preserve what they consider to be the constitutional rights of Americans. For example, the National Rifle Association was founded in 1871 to protect the right to own firearms, as well as to provide firearms training for police and self-defense courses, improve firearm safety, improve shooting techniques, and promote hunting in the United States.

Today, the National Rifle Association is better known as one of the main political forces advocating for reducing restrictions on gun ownership and defending Second Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, on the other hand, works to pass and enforce federal and state laws, regulations, and public policies that would provide stricter controls on gun use and ownership.

Both of these organizations, along with thousands of other civic organizations, play an important role in the gun control debate currently underway in the United States following the tragedy that occurred at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut, late last year.

Many civil society organizations, especially those that advocate for civil liberties, are devoting a great deal of attention to criticizing our authorities. The American Civil Liberties Union is a prime example. The purpose of this organization is to defend and preserve the rights and freedoms of the individual, as enshrined in the U.S. Constitution and in American laws.

Representatives of the American Civil Liberties Union work daily in courts, legislatures, and with the public to protect and preserve individual rights and freedoms.

Civil Liberties Union (CLU) civil society organizations oversee the actions of the government. Civil rights organizations in the U.S. monitor elections and campaign promises, investigate and expose corruption, and actively advocate on behalf of minority communities.

One function of NGOs is court monitoring, where U.S. citizens monitor decisions.
For example, WATCH, a Minnesota NGO, describes its purpose as improving the efficiency and responsiveness of the court system in cases of violence against women and children. This organization is a member of the National Association of Judicial Monitoring Programs, which provides training and materials to organizations in various states.

Because the U.S. Constitution guarantees openness of the courts to the public, members of community-based organizations that monitor the courts have no difficulty accessing the courts and observing what is going on in a court case.

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Public human rights organizations appeared first on Important Activities.

I have also been asked recently whether foreign NGOs work in the U.S. and whether American NGOs receive funding from abroad. The answer to both questions is yes. Foreign civil society organizations working in the United States range from the German Goethe Institute, which promotes German and German studies abroad and encourages international cultural exchanges, to the network of Confucius Institutes, which provides information on Chinese education, culture, economy and society. Another example is the Hitachi Foundation, based in Japan, which focuses on strengthening communities in the U.S. through programs such as the Business and Jobs program aimed at improving the lives of underserved Americans.

Since 2007, the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR) has supported key lobbying actions in favor of abolishing the death penalty in Illinois and Maryland. The European Commission acts as one of the largest donors of development projects in the world, and dozens of American civil society organizations submit project proposals to the European Commission for funding. All of Germany’s party institutes also work in the U.S. International human rights organizations such as Human Rights Watch, which has five offices in the US, and Amnesty International, which has six offices in the US, publish reports on the human rights situation in the US.

An individual does not need to be a U.S. citizen to register an NGO in the United States. Registration requirements vary from state to state, but no government permission is required to register an NGO. Foreign-funded organizations have no special restrictions on their activities. They can hold meetings and publish materials in free form. They do not have to report to the federal authorities, if they pay taxes. NCOs have the right to receive funding from abroad and work with foreign governments to achieve their goals. NCOs are not required to report on outreach work, recruitment and staffing to the authorities, and the authorities do not seek to influence foreign-funded NCO offices.

However, foreign nationals cannot fund political campaigns or parties unless those nationals are “lawful permanent residents.
Some citizens and organizations, if they are representatives of a foreign entity, must register with the Department of Justice and submit program information and financial records under the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA for short). The term “agent” is the key term in this law-it means that the organization or citizen is conducting its activities under the instruction of and on behalf of a foreign entity.

Simply receiving funds does not qualify a party as a foreign agent. Foreign entities can be foreign governments, foreign political parties, individual citizens or foreign organizations (excluding U.S. citizens), or organizations operating under the laws of a foreign country or conducting their principal activities in a foreign country. Many of the organizations registered in the United States as “foreign agents” are companies that directly and openly represent foreign governments (usually lobbyists).

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post International Public Organizations and International Funding appeared first on Important Activities.

Since the earliest days of U.S. history, which began 234 years ago, Americans have volunteered in a variety of actions to promote the country’s well-being and make life easier for those who are struggling. This year, for the first time, the federal government released “Public Life in America,” a report that describes how much U.S. residents remain committed to civic principles in both big and small ways by participating in formal organizations and in other ways.

The study, conducted by the Corporation for National and Local Community Service and the National Conference on Citizenship, showed a significant increase in volunteerism in the U.S. in 2009, when the country and the world were in economic crisis.

“Americans participate in community service both formally and informally,” said Lamonica Shelton of the Corporation for National and Local Community Service. – This is very important because we need to broaden perceptions of people’s participation in America’s problems. It’s not just about formal participation through organizations, but it’s about people just getting together in their neighborhoods and working on issues.”

National Conference on Citizenship staffer Michael Wieser notes that the report reveals three main areas of community action. “When times are tough, Americans come together to solve problems in their communities,” he says. – “They embrace problems rather than walk away from them, even though the task of making ends meet is becoming more urgent than it was a few years ago.

“Second, we learned that community action is contagious,” Wieser continues. – The report clearly shows that people who participate in one type of community activity – no matter how informal – tend to get involved in more formal volunteering. Third, we learned that the Civic Health Assessment we adopted is the very first step toward greater participation.”

According to Lamonica Shelton, the study revealed several indicators that show who is more likely to spend their time and talents volunteering. “If a person participates in one of the many forms of civic community activity that we focused on in the Public Life in America report, the chances of them getting involved in other activities goes up,” she explains. – It’s a cycle that’s gaining momentum: if a person is involved in volunteerism, they’re more likely to be involved in elections, and if people interact informally with their neighbors, they’re more likely to be involved in local civic organizations.

The number of Internet users in the U.S. is high and growing. It may seem that the World Wide Web distracts people from real and personal interaction with others. However, in terms of community service and civic participation, according to Michael Wieser, this understanding may be wrong. “The Internet is a tool that brings people together,” he says. – Eventually they can meet and work together face to face. Then they’ll work personally and closely together to solve community problems or work together in an organization. So the Internet is likely to help people find other people with similar interests. It can help overcome certain complexes. And at the end of the day, it helps them become what they want to become, which is to work together for the good of their community.”

Research on civic participation in the United States has been done in the past. Lamonica Shelton explains the specifics of the current study. “Previous work has examined the formal ways people participate through formal organizations,” she says. – “In our report, Public Life in America, we looked beyond volunteering. We looked at other aspects of community service, at informal activities, like when you work together with your neighbors to solve a problem. But then we also looked at other key areas, such as political activity, participation in groups, access to information about current events, and social connections.”

The report also noted the high level of community engagement among military veterans, as well as the role of corporations, many of which incorporate community engagement into their business strategy.

The “Public Life in America” report found that 63.4 million Americans were involved in at least one community organization in 2009. About 20 million people worked with others to solve specific problems. Six in 10 Americans provided services to their neighbors.

Happy

0 0 %

Sad

0 0 %

Excited

0 0 %

Sleepy

0 0 %

Angry

0 0 %

Surprise

0 0 %

The post Social activities are contagious appeared first on Important Activities.